top of page

Addressing biases in HR Communications with ChatGPT


You have many years of experience and are very accomplished as a recruiting executive and are currently in charge of the Talent Acquisition area for a well-known company. Recently, one of your staff presented you with a draft job posting (included below), and asked for your approval to post it in the company website as well as other job posting sites. You have concerns that this post is biased and want to review it. Please analyze and explain where and how this post is biased


---

**Job Title:


** Senior Sales Manager


**Location:


** Main Office, Downtown


**Company:** XYZ Corporation


**Job Description:**


XYZ Corporation, a leading company in the tech industry, is looking for an aggressive and high-energy Senior Sales Manager to join our dynamic team. The successful candidate will be a natural hunter, hungry to win new business and driven to exceed sales targets.


**Key Responsibilities:**


- Aggressively pursue and close new business opportunities

- Lead a team of junior sales representatives, ensuring they meet or exceed sales quotas - Build and maintain relationships with key stakeholders


**Qualifications:**


- Minimum 5 years of experience in a similar role

- Native English Speaker

- Ability to work long hours and weekends

- Must be a self-starter and have a competitive nature

- Ability to work in a fast-paced, male-dominated environment


**Benefits:**


- Competitive salary and uncapped commission

- Health and dental insurance


 

This job posting displays several biases, some of which might deter a diverse pool of candidates from applying. Let's dissect them:


1. **Aggressive Language:** The terminology used in this posting such as "aggressive," "natural hunter," "hungry to win," and "driven" may appeal more to males or individuals with a more aggressive demeanor, thus potentially alienating candidates who may have a different, yet equally effective, sales approach. This kind of language can perpetuate a culture that values aggressiveness over other equally important traits like teamwork, empathy, and customer-centricity.


2. **Gender Bias:** The phrase "Ability to work in a fast-paced, male-dominated environment" is overtly gender-biased. It suggests that the environment may not be welcoming or inclusive to individuals who are not male, thereby discouraging a diverse range of applicants.


3. **Language Requirement:** Stating "Native English Speaker" as a qualification may come across as discriminatory to individuals for whom English is a second language but are fluent or proficient in it. It's better to specify the level of language proficiency required for the role, if it's essential to job performance.


4. **Work-Life Balance:** The requirement for the ability to "work long hours and weekends" may deter individuals who have significant family or personal commitments. It's essential to consider if this is a necessary requirement for job performance or if there's a way to ensure a better work-life balance.


5. **Experience Requirement:** While it's standard to list the experience required, it’s good to ensure that "5 years of experience in a similar role" is a true reflection of the necessary experience needed to perform in this role successfully. Sometimes, the number of years listed can be arbitrary and may deter potentially qualified candidates from applying.


6. **Ambiguous Qualifications:** The term "self-starter" and "competitive nature" are somewhat ambiguous and subjective. It's better to provide clear, measurable qualifications that candidates can easily understand and evaluate themselves against.


The biases in this posting may narrow the diversity of the applicant pool, which could in turn limit the range of perspectives and experiences brought into the organization. It's advisable to revise the job posting to be more inclusive, clear, and focused on the necessary qualifications and skills required for the job, rather than personal traits or characteristics.


 

Please go ahead and revise this job posting so that it resolves the issues and biases you have highlighted


 

Absolutely, here's a revised version of the job posting: --- **Job Title:** Senior Sales Manager **Location:** Main Office, Downtown **Company:** XYZ Corporation **Job Description:** XYZ Corporation, a leading company in the tech industry, is seeking a motivated and results-driven Senior Sales Manager to join our dynamic team. The successful candidate will be focused on cultivating new business opportunities and guiding a team of junior sales representatives towards achieving and exceeding sales targets. **Key Responsibilities:** - Identify, pursue, and secure new business opportunities - Lead a team of junior sales representatives, ensuring they meet or exceed sales quotas - Build and maintain relationships with key stakeholders - Foster a collaborative and inclusive team environment **Qualifications:** - Minimum 5 years of experience in a similar role or equivalent - Proficient in English, both written and verbal - Willingness to work flexible hours when needed - Demonstrated ability to work effectively in a team-oriented setting - Proven track record of meeting or exceeding sales targets **Benefits:** - Competitive salary and uncapped commission - Health and dental insurance - Work-life balance support --- In this revised posting: 1. The aggressive language has been replaced with more neutral and inclusive terms. 2. The gender-biased phrase has been removed. 3. Language requirement has been changed to reflect proficiency rather than native speaking abilities. 4. The phrase about working long hours and weekends has been softened to express a willingness to work flexible hours when needed, and a bullet point about fostering a collaborative and inclusive team environment has been added. 5. The ambiguous qualifications have been replaced with clear, measurable qualifications. 6. A bullet point about work-life balance support has been added to the benefits section, which could appeal to a broader range of potential candidates. This revision aims to attract a more diverse range of applicants by being more inclusive and clear in the language and qualifications listed.


Comments


Par for Performance thesis by Fermin Diez

©2022 FERMIN DIEZ

Pay for Performance: What Pay Scheme is Best for Achieving Results?

My research has been downloaded in over 80 countries.
Get a free e-copy sent directly to your mailbox!

Check your inbox for the copy!

  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
bottom of page